A spousal support order in Halifax, Nova Scotia can generally be changed when there has been a material change in the condition, means, needs, or other circumstances of either former spouse since the order was made or last varied. Under section 17 of the federal Divorce Act, either former spouse can apply to vary, suspend, or rescind a spousal support order.
A “material change” does not simply mean that circumstances have changed. The Supreme Court of Canada has explained that the change must be significant enough that, if it had been known when the original order was made, it would likely have resulted in different terms.
Changes in income, employment, health, financial needs, or other circumstances may potentially support a variation application. However, the specific facts and the wording of the existing order matter. A Halifax family lawyer can review the existing order, assess whether the circumstances have changed enough to meet the legal threshold, and advise on the appropriate way to seek a variation.
A material change is a significant change in circumstances that could justify changing the existing spousal support order.
Section 17(4.1) of the Divorce Act requires the court to be satisfied that there has been a change in the condition, means, needs, or other circumstances of either former spouse since the support order or most recent variation order was made.
The Supreme Court of Canada has clarified that the change must be more than a minor or insignificant development. The question is whether the change is one that, if known when the original order was made, would likely have resulted in different support terms.
For example, a substantial and unexpected change in income may potentially be material. A significant change in the recipient’s financial needs or ability to earn income may also be relevant.
The person asking the court to change the order has the burden of establishing the change. The court then considers what variation, if any, is justified by that change.
Changes in income are one of the most common reasons people consider applying to change spousal support, but they are not the only possibility.
A material change could involve a significant change in either spouse’s financial circumstances, earning capacity, needs, or other relevant circumstances. For example, a substantial loss of employment could affect the paying spouse’s ability to meet the existing obligation. Conversely, a significant increase in the recipient’s income or earning capacity could potentially affect the amount of support being paid.
The circumstances surrounding the original order also matter. A change that was already known or specifically contemplated when the order was made may not establish the required material change. The Supreme Court of Canada has emphasized the importance of examining the circumstances and terms of the existing order when determining whether a later development qualifies.
This is why simply pointing to a change in income is not necessarily enough. A Halifax family lawyer can help determine whether the change is legally relevant and whether it meets the threshold for variation.
The process depends in part on what type of order you have and which legislation governs it.
If the spousal support order was made under the Divorce Act, section 17 permits either former spouse to apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for a variation.
For support matters proceeding under Nova Scotia’s provincial family law legislation, Nova Scotia court materials provide a support variation process requiring an application and evidence documenting the change in circumstances. The province’s variation materials specifically require information about the change, when it occurred, and whether it is temporary or permanent, along with supporting documentation.
The steps may include:
The correct procedure can depend on how the existing order was made, where the parties live, and whether the parties agree to the proposed change. Getting legal advice before filing can help avoid using the wrong process or asking the court to make a change that the evidence does not support.
The first question in a variation case should not simply be, “What has changed?” It should be, “What has changed since the order was made, and does that change actually affect the basis of the order?”
This is an important distinction because a person’s income may have changed, but the court will look at the nature and significance of that change, as well as what was known or contemplated when the original order was made.
It is also important to remember that a variation application is not an opportunity to start the entire spousal support analysis from scratch. Once the threshold for variation is established, the court considers what change to the existing order is justified by the new circumstances. The Supreme Court of Canada has emphasized that a variation should be limited to what is appropriate in light of the material change.
For that reason, reviewing the existing order and the evidence behind the proposed change is often the most useful place to start.
You generally apply to the appropriate court for a variation of the existing support order and provide evidence showing the change in circumstances. If the order falls under the Divorce Act, either former spouse can apply under section 17. Nova Scotia also has forms and procedures for support variation applications under provincial legislation. The correct process depends on the existing order and the circumstances of the parties.
No. Either former spouse can apply to vary a spousal support order under section 17 of the Divorce Act. If both spouses agree, they may be able to use a consent process, but agreement is not required to bring a variation application. If the parties disagree, the court can determine whether the legal threshold for changing the order has been met.
Yes, an increase in your ex-spouse’s income can potentially support a variation, but an income increase does not automatically result in a change to spousal support. The court must first determine whether there has been a material change in circumstances since the existing order was made or last varied. The significance of the income change and the circumstances surrounding the original order will be relevant.
A significant decrease in income may potentially support an application to reduce spousal support, but the change must meet the applicable legal threshold. You should not assume that support payments automatically change because your financial circumstances have changed. The existing order remains in effect unless it is properly varied, suspended, or otherwise changed through the appropriate process.
Not necessarily. The significance and duration of a change are relevant, but the court considers the circumstances of each case. Nova Scotia’s support variation materials specifically ask applicants to identify when the change occurred and whether it is temporary or permanent.
Possibly, if both parties can reach an agreement and complete the appropriate legal process. However, an existing court order should not simply be ignored or informally changed between the parties. If you are unsure how to formalize an agreed change, a Halifax family lawyer can explain the available options and help ensure the documentation accurately reflects the agreement.
The Riley Divorce & Family Law Firm